Anwar vs Shabery

There were two winners in the debate. The first winner was Anwar and the second was not Shabery but the government. Anwar has not lost his touch in the slightest when it comes to debate. Articulation and mastery in language placed him in the different league than Shahbery. Regardless, Shabery must be applauded for his daring endeavour to challenge the former Deputy Prime Minister for a debate on national television. Hopefully, this debate will be the precedence for future debate among politicians. Anwar's thoughts and aspirations championed the people's wish be it plausible or not it does not matter. The remark "Populist" by Shabery on Anwar is also to be something for us to ponder upon. Is it popular to be the oppositions lately? Being opposition, a blogger can become a MP and an underdog could be a tiger any day so long it against the government. Speaking of which, it reminds of Loh Gwo Burne who rose to fame for exposing VK Lingam video. He is currently MP of Kelana Jaya and never expected to be shot to fame to the extent of being MP. His 'prolific' political career can be read here.Shame. Not to discredit him but I think he is happy enough to be what he was before. This is the price of emotional hatred towards the rulers. At the end Kelana Jaya has a very 'competent' MP. Back to the debate =P. Yes Anwar was the winner for his supporters and the government was the winner for its supporters. It all depends on your point of view. Where do you stand is where the basis of your opinion lies.

Daydreaming would make Johnny a lazy guy